Tuesday, 27 August 2013

Women's Roles


Should women’s roles be limited in the kitchen?

Ever since 1994 which was the year which the apartheid ended, women’s roles in our country changed. As we all know, before that it was required that women were not allowed to have jobs and earn a salary for themselves, all they were required to do was to stay at home and become housewives and take care of household works like, cooking, cleaning and taking care of the kids.

 Well all that has changed now, these days women are allowed to have jobs and earn salaries for themselves and their families, some women are leaders in the Country and some are owners of big properties. Due to this some men think that women shouldn’t have jobs, that they should stay at home just like the old times, many men feel threatened by women who work in higher positions than them. Men believe that they should be the ones who go out to work for their families while their wives stay home and become housewives. So should women’s roles be limited in the kitchen?

I disagree with the fact that women’s roles should be limited in the kitchen. As we all know that this is the 21’st century and things have changed. Certain rights have been developed for women ever since the apartheid ended. Rights like, the right to equality and freedom. So women and men should have equal rights at all times, no one should think that they are better than the other. Women are free to do whatever they want to do as long as they are not breaking the law, they are allowed to find jobs and provide for their families as well. So this issue of men being the only species to work should grow out of individuals because the old is gone and the new has come. Women should indeed be able to serve in equal rights as men; the whole thing of men being the only severs is completely sexist. Women can do anything men can do, if a woman wants to serve her country, who are you to judge or even stop her from doing it.

Some men are just very selfish, they don’t want women to jobs because they want to be the ones who rule in the family, the ones who earn salaries so that their wives can depend on them. Yes men are the leaders in the family, even the Bible states that, but that does not mean that they should overdo it. Yes men are stronger than women, but there are women who are stronger than men, and that doesn’t mean that women should be pushed away because of their sex. That is like judging someone by the colour of their skin and that is very wrong.

After viewing all the aspects of weather women’s roles should be limited in the kitchen, Mrs Mashishi who is a dentist was interviewed just to hear her side of the story and weather she agrees or disagree with this fact, and this is what she said; “Men and women are equal, so why do men have different rights? Women have the right to choose, so why don’t they have that option? Yes I know that back in the old days women stayed at home and cooked, cleaned, and took care of the children; but it is obvious that our world is much more evolved than it was back then. Yes men are the stronger sex, but if women want to serve their country they should at least have the option”.

After hearing Mrs Mashishi’s side of the story Mr Modise who is the owner of Incroyable Guesthouse in Midrand was also interviewed just to hear the story from a male perspective and this is what he said; “yes I think women’s roles should be limited in the kitchen because ever since women got their right to be equal as men and to freedom, they started to loose respect for their husbands in their homes because they felt that they rule their homes as well just like men since they both earn a salary for the family. So it was better in the olden days when women stayed at home and focused on households activities”. After hearing Mr Modise’s side of the story I realised that not all people disagree with this , some agree that women’s roles should be limited in the kitchen especially men.

So not all people have the same perspective about women, everyone has their own judgements, but with the research that has been made about women’s roles being limited in the kitchen a majority of people seem to disagree with this due to the rights of women and the new evolved world.

 

References

tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/main/stayinThekitchen


Monday, 19 August 2013

Zwelinzima Vavi


Was it ethical for Zwelinzima Vavi to have sex with a junior COSATU employee?

COSATU secretary general Zwelinzima vavi has been accused of rape by a COSATU junior employee (whose name has been withheld for ethical reasons). She claimed that claimed that on January 25 2013 Vavi came to her office at COSATU house, grabbed her, locked the door and forced himself on her.

This was a private and very sensitive matter but everyone around the country was and still is talking about it. People are asking questions like, is he guilty or not? But the truth will eventually come out at some point. Vavi has been interrogated a lot the public about these rape accusations towards him. Vavi issued a public statement confirming that he had intercourse with the employee but denied rape. “He in turn laid a complaint of blackmail and extortion against the woman and her husband at the Sandton police station, claiming that the couple had demanded R2million to let the matter go away.(Londa Lowen, 2012)

Now after vavi admitted having intercourse with the COSATU junior employee the public started to ask more questions as he was a public figure and leader to most, so why would he commit such? Why would he have sex in the work place and with a junior employee who is on the other hand married? Is it ethical for them to have sex during work hours and in the place of work? This incident has been viewed as a very unethical thing to do especially by someone who is a general secretary, someone who is valued by a lot of people in the country. Now will the public still respect and value him as they did before?

As expected the Congress South African Trade Union (COSATU) central executive committee took a decision to suspend Zwelinzima Vavi, its general secretary. An internal board will now sit and find him guilty of bringing COSATU into disrepute and he will permanently be removed from the leadership of COSATU. Some people believe that he is really guilty of rape, they believe that since he had powers he believed that he could abuse his powers then get away with it. Well Vavi keeps denying rape repeatedly.

This is an extremely intimate, private, personal and delicate matter that requires great sensitivity and maturity to manage on my part. It involves dignity and lives of private individuals. We all have constitutional responsibility to defend each other’s dignity and integrity, Says Mr Z Vavi. Adultery (as wrong as it is )is not the enemy here, the circumstances surrounding Vavi’s adultery are the main concern. He could have sex with the employee somewhere else not at the work place. Not only is vavi a product of men society, he occupies a political position that take his inherent teachings from the society and assists him to further fulfil them.

So weather vavi is guilty of rape or not he still committed an unethical action by having sex with a junior employee at their workplace as he admitted. Abuse of women is a very serious offence. Abuse of power is very serious; no one should be above the law. In this case vavi’s guilt has not been established. “we have seen scandals like this before in South Africa” said political analyst Somandoda Fikeni “sex scandals don’t have precedents of taking out leaders” he said, adding that vavi’s political career will be weakened, if it survives.

Zwelinzima Vavi says that he recognises that some people remain “unforgiving” about his affair with a COSATU employee. He also said that he committed an error and he apologised for it, but added that many people accepted his apology and many remained unforgiving.

 

 

Bibliography

Linda Lowen, about.com guide. September 18, 2012

newswall.co.za/news/latest/the-new-age…/vavi-s…sex…/a2va3.201067

www.enca.com/south-africa/vavi-pleads-privacy-following-sex-scandals